I’ve used my British Library card
as it was surely intended – ? – and
ordered up a 19th-century book whose full title is in fact: ‘British
Manly Exercises; in which Rowing and Sailing are now first described and Riding
and Diving are for the first time given in a work of this kind; as well as the
usual subjects of Walking, Running, Leaping, Vaulting, Balancing, Scating,
Climbing, Swimming, Wrestling, Boxing, Training, &c. &c &c’.
So, laughs-a-plenty are promised
by the language of the title, and the book doesn’t disappoint. But if it wasn’t
written like that, could we still tell it was written in 1834? Yes. For
example, we are told that the dress code for exercise was a straw hat and loosely-fitting
trousers. Our modern notion of pushing the limits is ruled out: ‘whenever the
gymnast feels tired, or falls behind his usual mark, he should resume his
clothes, and walk home’. Why exactly these exercises should be British, and why
they should be manly, is not explained – although we are told that for Greek
and Roman athletes ‘the sexual intercourse [sic] was strictly prohibited’. The
line forms a paragraph on its own. Let’s hear no more about it.
The section on running cutely
defines it as ‘precisely intermediate to walking and leaping […] a series of
leaps from each foot alternately must be performed, in order to constitute it’.
I’ll have to remember that next time I’m doing cross-country. Later, the action
of running is described as follows: ‘the whole arms move but slightly, in order
that the muscles of respiration on the chest may as little as possible be
disturbed’. Again, I’d never thought of it like that, but it’s true that your
arms should be relatively still. The section describes ‘moderate running’ (up
to 700 yards) and ‘rapid running’ (100 yards), before telling us about some
‘feats in running’. Of course, 1834 is a long time before Roger Bannister: ‘the
mile was perhaps never run in four minutes; but it has been done in four
minutes and a half. A mile in five minutes is good running. Two miles in ten
minutes is oftener failed in than accomplished. Four miles in twenty minutes is
said to puzzle the cleverest’.
The book also has some unusual
training tips. These are probably its most interesting part because they raise
the possibility that in future our current training wisdom could sound just as
strange (for instance the obsession with drinking: see Tim Noakes,
‘Waterlogged: the Serious Problem of Overhydration in Endurance Sports’). We
are told that little sleep is best, and that training is helped by doses of medicinal
Sodium sulfate. In terms of nutrition, two meals of broiled beef or mutton per
day are prescribed, but – careful! – without any salt or ‘spiceries’. Very
little is said about what distances to actually run, the emphasis instead being
placed on a sauna-like treatment: having run four miles in flannel kit and ‘at
the top of his speed’, the athlete must drink a pint of hot ‘sweating liquor’
containing caraway seed, coriander seed, root-liquorice, sugar-candy, and
cider. He then must sit in bed beneath 6-8 blankets, sweating and dreaming of
glory.
Perhaps in future garmin watches,
energy gels, and breathable clothing will sound as quaint as what ‘British
Manly Exercises’ prescribes for its athletes. I can’t wait to hear about the new
ways in which exercise will ‘confer beauty of form and contribute to impart an
elegant air and graceful manners’.
No comments:
Post a Comment